scala-rewrites
scala-rewrites copied to clipboard
scala
Scalafix Rewrites for Scala
## About this PR 📦 Updates * [ch.epfl.scala:sbt-scalafix](https://github.com/scalacenter/sbt-scalafix) * [ch.epfl.scala:scalafix-rules](https://github.com/scalacenter/scalafix) from `0.11.0` to `0.11.1` 📜 [GitHub Release Notes](https://github.com/scalacenter/sbt-scalafix/releases/tag/v0.11.1) - [Version Diff](https://github.com/scalacenter/sbt-scalafix/compare/v0.11.0...v0.11.1) ## Usage ✅ **Please merge!** I'll automatically update this...
## About this PR 📦 Updates [org.scala-sbt:sbt](https://github.com/sbt/sbt) from `1.9.8` to `1.9.9` 📜 [GitHub Release Notes](https://github.com/sbt/sbt/releases/tag/v1.9.9) - [Version Diff](https://github.com/sbt/sbt/compare/v1.9.8...v1.9.9) ## Usage ✅ **Please merge!** I'll automatically update this PR to resolve...
sbt wasn't particularly favourable among all developers: https://www.lihaoyi.com/post/SowhatswrongwithSBT.html Alternatives are Maven, Gradle, Mill, scala-cli and Bazel. scala-rewrites minimally depends on semanticDB, there must be consistent ways to configure it outside...
I'm trying to upgrade my codebase from 2.11 to 2.13. I have a wrapper application for scalafix (it just invokes scalafix programatically - which is on scala 2.12, and rewrite...
The ScalaSeq rule seems to crash in a confusing way if it's just listed in the rules part of the scalafix configuration without any additional options: ``` error: {"rules": ["fix.scala213.ScalaSeq"]}...
## About this PR 📦 Updates [com.github.sbt:sbt-ci-release](https://github.com/sbt/sbt-ci-release) from `1.5.12` to `1.6.1` 📜 [GitHub Release Notes](https://github.com/sbt/sbt-ci-release/releases/tag/v1.6.1) - [Version Diff](https://github.com/sbt/sbt-ci-release/compare/v1.5.12...v1.6.1) ## Usage ✅ **Please merge!** I'll automatically update this PR to resolve...