improvement-proposals

improvement-proposals copied to clipboard

SIP-66 - Implicit macro conversions

7

Iltotore

SIP-70 - Flexible Varargs

3

lihaoyi

SIP-68: Reference-able Package Objects

6

lihaoyi

SIP-67 - Improve strictEquality feature for better compatibility with existing code bases

34

Hi there, I'd like to use the `strictEquality` feature for the improved type safety it provides, but currently find it too inconvenient to use due to an unfortunate interaction with...

mberndt123

SIP-69: Existential containers

1

kyouko-taiga

Both Scala 2 and Scala 3 have adopted the following pattern for `AnyVal` extension methods (`foo$extension`) while the [SIP](https://docs.scala-lang.org/sips/value-classes.html#step-3-erasure) mentions the following pattern `extension$foo`. Not sure if we should update...

hamzaremmal

Explore the concerns of https://github.com/scala/improvement-proposals/pull/86#issuecomment-2543342919. When we proposed inline type classes for collection literals, this issue did not come up. Can the technique be ported to inline conversions?

odersky