bug
bug copied to clipboard
Support forward reference from annotation argument to member of the annotated class.
With Scalac 2.10, the use of any objects, class or method annotaded with the com.unboundid.util.ThreadSafetyLevel leads to java.lang.AssertionError.
For example, the following file Test.scala:
import com.unboundid.ldap.sdk.Entry
object Test extends App {
val foo = new Entry("plop")
}
Leads to :
% scalac -classpath ./lib/unboundid-ldapsdk-2.3.1.jar src/Test.scala
warning: Caught: java.lang.AssertionError: assertion failed:
while compiling: src/Test.scala
during phase: global=typer, atPhase=parser
library version: version 2.10.0
compiler version: version 2.10.0
reconstructed args: -classpath ./lib/unboundid-ldapsdk-2.3.1.jar
last tree to typer: Ident(Entry)
symbol: <none> (flags: )
symbol definition: <none>
symbol owners:
context owners: value foo -> object Test -> package <empty>
== Enclosing template or block ==
Template( // val <local Test>: <notype> in object Test
"App" // parents
ValDef(
private
"_"
<tpt>
<empty>
)
// 2 statements
DefDef( // def <init>: <?> in object Test
<method>
"<init>"
[]
List(Nil)
<tpt>
Block(
Apply(
super."<init>"
Nil
)
()
)
)
ValDef( // private[this] val foo: <?> in object Test
private <local> <locked>
"foo"
<tpt>
Apply(
new Entry."<init>"
"plop"
)
)
)
com.unboundid.util.ThreadSafetyLevel while parsing annotations in ./lib/unboundid-ldapsdk-2.3.1.jar(com/unboundid/util/ThreadSafetyLevel.class)
one warning found
ThreadSafety.java source here: http://ldap-sdk.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/ldap-sdk/trunk/src/com/unboundid/util/ThreadSafety.java?revision=410&view=markup
Link to unboundid-ldapsdk-2.3.1.jar: https://www.unboundid.com/products/ldap-sdk/files/unboundid-ldapsdk-2.3.1-se.zip
That seems to be linked to the following comment: https://github.com/scala/scala/blob/master/src/compiler/scala/tools/nsc/symtab/classfile/ClassfileParser.scala#L1033
// We want to be robust when annotations are unavailable, so the very least
// we can do is warn the user about the exception
// There was a reference to ticket 1135, but that is outdated: a reference to a class not on
// the classpath would *not* end up here. A class not found is signaled
// with a `FatalError` exception, handled above. Here you'd end up after a NPE (for example),
// and that should never be swallowed silently.
Imported From: https://issues.scala-lang.org/browse/SI-7014?orig=1 Reporter: Francois Armand (fanf) Affected Versions: 2.10.0, 2.10.2 See #7551
Sebastian Meßmer (smessmer) said: same bug here. It's only a warning, but it's a disturbing one with a lot of output.
Mariusz Sakowski (sakfa) said: Same thing here, major issue for me because Play Framework 2.0 gets confused when displaying normal compilation errors (displays this warning instead)
Francois Armand (fanf) said: Since Scala 2.10.2, that bug simply terminate the build, so basically, I can't use Scala 2.10.2 on my project. I would qualify that one as blocker now - I'm stuck with Scala 2.10.1.
@adriaanm said: sorry to hear it -- looking into it test files here: https://github.com/adriaanm/scala/tree/ticket-7014
@gkossakowski said: Assigning to Adriaan who seemed to look into this. Feel free to unassign if you don't plan to work on this ticket.
Francois Armand (fanf) said (edited on Jul 16, 2013 11:47:37 AM UTC): I just got eaten with the update to Scala-IDE 3.0.1 which uses Scala 2.10.2, and so is not usable on our project. So, that bug is starting to be really annoying.
All in all, I prefered the past behaviour, with hundreds of assert error lines in the log. Our build output were crap, but actually could build the project...
Sonnenschein (sonnenschein) said: I've also voted for this issue to be resolved.
For the time being, I decided to package my single layer dealing with LDAP into a separate JAR which I than use as an unmanaged library. Since the rest doesn't need a dependency to UnboundID-SDK, I can keep out the annoying noise from the rest.
Peter
Jun Yamog (jkyamog) said: Same here. We are using unboundid in our play app. So eclipse is reporting SBT is crashing. We haven't upgraded our play project, so command line compiling is still working.
@adriaanm said: Looks like RUNTIME retention annotations aren't supported: https://github.com/scala/scala/blob/2.10.x/src/compiler/scala/tools/nsc/symtab/classfile/ClassfileParser.scala#L911
Not sure what we can do for this in 2.10, as this is now a maintenance release. Happy to take PRs. I'll still see if I can avoid the crash and continue with a dummy or something.
@adriaanm said: I jumped to conclusions: the problem is the forward reference from the annotation argument to a member of the annotated class. We won't be able to fix this for 2.10.3, but I'll submit a PR that turns the crash into a warning. You should be able to compile normally, I assume.
@adriaanm said (edited on Aug 13, 2013 10:18:44 PM UTC): Fix for crasher: https://github.com/scala/scala/pull/2829 (Don't close on merging.)
@retronym said: See also #7551 / https://github.com/retronym/scala/compare/ticket;7551
commit b545e410e072600b1dc77c6b8536eb3c22cd657a
Author: Jason Zaugg <[email protected]>
Date: Tue Jun 4 09:32:36 2013 +0200
WIP SI-7551 Ignore class file parser cycles in annotations
But should we be parsing runtime visible annotations other than
ScalaSignature at all?
Francois Armand (fanf) said: I can confirm that the workaround allows to build our project again, and avoid displaying horrible debug information on the stdout.
Thanks!
Hendy Irawan (ceefour) said: +1 for this
Does anyone know how to mute this class of warnings? Using a protoc based library that I cannot change and it is very noisy, with dozens of warnings.
can you post a minimized reproducer?
@lrytz https://github.com/everson/scala-7014-issue
Note that this is literally just reproducing OP's problem. The issue I am currently facing is of similar class, but depending on a library from another team internal to my company.
I had to remove ThisBuild / scalacOptions := Seq(..."-Xfatal-warnings") in order to move on, but I would hope to ignore just this class of exception, but keep using fatal-warnings, if possible.
Additionally, the code has dozens of instances of this issue, becoming very annoying.
@everson are you familiar with -Wconf and/or @nowarn?
Rigth, -Wconf:msg=scala/bug#7014:s for example.
Sorry it took this long to respond. I wasn't familiar. Thank you both @SethTisue @lrytz!