Scala Buggabot

Shelby Moore III (shelby) said: See the code sample I added, which does not compile.

Shelby Moore III (shelby) said (edited on Nov 7, 2012 3:49:15 PM UTC): I was able to find an alternative formulation for the `size` function, which avoids the bug. But...

Shelby Moore III (shelby) said (edited on Nov 8, 2012 8:57:41 AM UTC): To combine the fix from the other bug report: https://issues.scala-lang.org/browse/SI-5549?focusedCommentId=57261&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-57261 ```scala class D[-A] (v: A) { def...

Shelby Moore III (shelby) said (edited on Nov 8, 2012 1:45:38 PM UTC): Note the workaround is not a solution for all cases, because this bug infects function definition sites...

Shelby Moore III (shelby) said (edited on Nov 8, 2012 2:26:20 PM UTC): Perhaps this comment will be getting even further away from the actual bug, which is more general...

Imported From: https://issues.scala-lang.org/browse/SI-9040?orig=1 Reporter: @dotta Affected Versions: 2.11.4

Imported From: https://issues.scala-lang.org/browse/SI-7697?orig=1 Reporter: @paulp Affected Versions: 2.10.4, 2.11.5

@retronym said: The terminology is confusing here. "Ambiguous implicits" describes competing, applicable implicits which score equally on the specificity test. Here, we have have an ambiguous binding. This is really...

@paulp said: I don't understand the relevance of separate compilation. I didn't mean go decompiling the bytecode to look at the the method, I meant they are literally the identical...

@retronym said: They could, however, predicate some logic on the identity of `Impy.this`.