Sebastian Funk
Sebastian Funk
Type of issue: Proposal for a new vignette Detail: People often state that estimation in the package is slow (e.g. https://journals.plos.org/digitalhealth/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pdig.0000052.t002). This is to some degree a function of the...
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe: Forecast evaluation is an important part of broader workflows around forecasting. [scoringutils](https://epiforecasts.io/scoringutils) is an R package for evaluating forecasts. It...
At the moment the main functions in the package expect a data frame with columns `date` and `confirm`. Also much of the reporting refers to "confirmed cases". However, the package...
Rather than one option for the whole model
As we move towards extending the `_opts` interface to specifying the data and preprocessing (#346) we are adding complexity to the user interaction. Where in the past a user would...
Once #504 and #525 are done this opens the option of extending the distribution interface to allow any parameter to vary over time. An interface for Gaussian processes could e.g....
`secondary_opts` has just one named option: `type` ("incidence" or "prevalence"). This could be added to the observation model options instead, and a `calculate_secondary` call be added to the `estimate_infections` model...
Before releasing 1.5.0 we should check that - [ ] all deprecation warnings point to the correct version - [ ] no functions remain which have their deprecation cycle completed...
The [reference page](https://epiforecasts.io/EpiNow2/dev/reference/index.html) lists quite a few functions as "internal" but in reality they're a mixture of functions users might interact with (the `..._opts` functions) and ones they'll never call...
We should probably bundle these checks into one as it's getting repeated in several places. _Originally posted by @jamesmbaazam in https://github.com/epiforecasts/EpiNow2/pull/557#discussion_r1494641426_