Simon Bernard
Simon Bernard
I improve this a bit more : - I remove all the class named ClazzName2 (like LeshanServer2, LeshanBuilderServer2, ...) - I make the code build again. (lot of test was...
The API in this PR looks like this : ```java // You create your LeshanServer with the builde like before LeshanServerBuilder builder = new LeshanServerBuilder(); // But builder does not...
I push some experimental code about abstraction at client side. The API is near than one used at server side bu as expected (https://github.com/eclipse/leshan/pull/1220#issuecomment-1068986342) I'm afraid it will be not...
I created a POC about coap over tcp support at #1312 which helps me to raise/fix some design issue I missed at first try. I think next step should be...
> I think next step should be to try to implement a more clean version of the endpoint abstraction at server side This is done at #1318.
I will now try to go with a cleaner version at client side.
> I will now try to go with a cleaner version at client side. This is done at #1323 So I close this PR which is obsolete now.
@rettichschnidi, should we close this one ? Or do you want to create a new issue like https://github.com/eclipse/leshan/issues/830 and pin it ? From my experience getting information about adopter is...
This is integrated in master (commit fccf81dfeeaf69e7ae06eab13ec26cbdc881e7e7)
There is some issue with the log, I need to test it more (I remove it from `master`)