sbengo

@Slach , @cjw296 as I supposed, it was a Grafana problem. The following PR https://github.com/grafana/grafana/pull/69289 fixes it (tested locally with docker `:main`) and working fine. Note the related issue, as...

Hi @Slach , we have upgraded Grafana to 10.0.3 and I was wrong: the issue has been fixed when the user changes the variables, but for some reason, when the...

@Slach , I have already asked on the original issue: https://github.com/grafana/grafana/issues/69207#issuecomment-1700392085

@maxadamo , as you can have different retention policies it means that there can be different measurements and fields as well. You had recently make a PR (already merged) #27...

Hi @maxadamo , thanks for the answer! I assume that Franco's issue is actually solved by already merged PR. My comment was addressed entirely to you: - Fields can differ...

Hi @karn09 , thanks for the detailed feedback. I'm very surprised of time spent retrieving the schema, how many measurements do you have on DB and what cardinality? I think...

Hi @karn09 , thanks for your feedback. I have been able to reproduce the case and it still surprises me the time difference between commands As you have said, and...

Measurement rename is not implemented yet! Reopening!

Hi @ptoews , sorry for the late answer First of all, thanks for submitting this! I'm not sure about your implementation and why you would like to change the copy...

Hi @gsexton , you are totally right! There is no "Getting Started" entry on wiki so I underestand that for new users, even if they have experience with InfluxDB, its...