Sebastian Bauer
Sebastian Bauer
Am 2018-06-18 10:15, schrieb AV00: > Understood. > In the meantime, I've done like you said, taken the latest clib2 > archive from bintray and simply overwrote the existing clib2...
I'm not sure if I understood your procedure correctly. But some header files of libstdc++ include some generated header files and these depend on the availability of certain features of...
Am 2018-06-19 09:23, schrieb AV00: > On 2018-06-18 23:18, Sebastian Bauer wrote: >> I'm not sure if I understood your procedure correctly. But some > header >> files of libstdc++...
Am 2018-06-19 17:54, schrieb AV00: > I'm trying that and compilation fails several times in binutils > because > of -Werror and mainly case statements with fall-throughs. I fixed those...
Guess it is related to #33. We probably should switch back to clib2.
Thanks for the report. Do you have any suggestion how to solve this? Shall adtools-binutils depend on adtools-sdk perhaps?
> Again stable tarball is preferred, would this be possible? Everything is possible. Please file a separate issue or even better provide a patch via a new PR :)
Can you please clean the history with this patch (i.e., "Next try" is not a nice git comment). I think that a single commit should be enough. Also describe some...
Yes, much better! But can you please describe within the gild commit from which version the new files originate from? This helps maintaining it.
Merged and thanks!