Suheb

Tagged for 0.18. Gated on @carlaKC 's review

> @saubyk add to 18.0? makes sense. added.

cc: @yyforyongyu

So, this seems to be a non-issue in the releases after 17.3 Closing this issue now.

tagged for 18.1

> tagged for 18.1 On a second thought, 18.1 is already getting bloated and this doesn't seem urgent so moving to 0.19

Shouldn't this be addressed at the spec level?

> tho we could make this configurable, that we can use percentiles. +1 for configurability and use of percentiles. Much better control IMO, if we have a degree of confidence...

> Yeah, new failures keep popping up that I cannot easily reproduce locally. Or only with spending a lot of time on it, which I haven't found yet. Not sure...

cc: @ProofOfKeags for taking this over