Sara Dickinson

@wtoorop @huitema Can you update as to if there is anything outstanding left to fix under this issue or if it can be closed? Thanks!

We should note that this changes the fact that the user can currently ignore the response dict (and is not responsible for freeing it). So this is actually a major...

Noted - we need to improve how the daemonization occurs - we should really have a stubby user and drop privileges after binding....

Hi @monperrus, thanks for the request. We've thought about adding this but haven't done so yet because we are not convinced of the benefit of sending queries to different servers...

Sadly I don't have a clear answer for you at the moment apart from to limit your server selection to only those you trust to see all your queries... it...

BTW - I believe there will be an IETF I-D submitted soon on ODNS for discussion in DPRIVE.

@monperrus @ArchangeGabriel Hi Both, I was referring to some of the discussion around early use cases for DoH where it was proposed that for a given website/application there could be...

Nice - thanks!

Some recent research/papers: * https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-arkko-abcd-distributed-resolver-selection-01 * https://arxiv.org/pdf/2001.08901v1.pdf * https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3472305.3472318

Acknowledged - we should handle this better. But I think in your specific case you should at least have seen this: ```WARNING: No Stubby config file found... using minimal default...