Stefan Appelhoff

Calling @bids-standard/raw-mri experts for help.

The 1.8 release will probably come mid September. It'd be great to have the new hed features in by then!

I think the only open question is whether or not we want to add the regexp suggested by @happy5214 to the BIDS schema validation. If you have strict rules about...

I have added the `hed_version` format as suggested by @happy5214. If you disagree, we can discuss removing it again -- but I think it's a good idea to validate HED...

Thanks @VisLab et al. :tada:

I don't have experience with this modality but I am happy you are willing to take the responsibility to lead this BEP onwards. I'll continue to support it with regards...

Triggered by @VisLab's comment in #1043, I am reading this again. There are two problems: 1. the concrete problem of how to interpret the optional `sample` column in events.tsv 2....

two notes: 1. I changed the target of this PR from `master` to a new branch [`bep029_motion`](https://github.com/bids-standard/bids-examples/tree/bep029_motion) 2. it would be best to submit each example dataset with a separate...

in case you wonder about me changing the base of the branch, that's because you merged "master" into your branch -- but the actual target of this PR is "bep029_motion"...

see https://github.com/bids-standard/bids-examples/pull/335#issue-1360822464 for reasons why I closed this.