Santiago Soler
Santiago Soler
I agree that having `utils` everywhere can be annoying, and having a single place for them would be much better. I was trying to tackle #1440 based on @lheagy's comments....
@jcapriot would you like to take a look at this? Specially to the scripts for deploying the docs. I added those to experiment and see if the setup works properly...
I think one can only serve one GH page per repo. Basically, we can only configure GH Pages on a single branch. While reading your first comment I thought the...
Awesome! Thanks for pointing to the docs. I'll give it a try in [simpeg-doctest](https://github.com/simpeg/simpeg-doctest) and if we like it I'll update the pipeline here.
Ok. I've tried yesterday setting up a `main` branch in `simpeg-doctest` that includes submodules `dev` and `v0.21.1` that points to branches with the same name in that repo. I've configured...
That was it. Thanks for spotting that!
I've updated the scripts for deploying to simpeg-doctest. Would love to have a second pair of eyes over there. One question that I have now regarding submodules is if gh...
That makes sense. I forgot we need to update the submodules as well. Regarding your proposal, I think it would be better to have versions in their own branches. Mainly...
Sounds good. I agree that would be better, indeed. One thing that is not very clear in the `validate_list_of_types` is that it doesn't fail if the passed object is not...