QSsh
QSsh copied to clipboard
Use rand() instead of QRandomGenerator for performance reasons
When running tests I found that QRandomGenerator took ages (literally minutes) to generate random numbers for the test binary data. Using rand() instead decreases this time to non-noticable. Since no high-quality random numbers are required for the testing purposes the choice of rand() should be justified.
@sandsmark can you please have a look why the pipeline fails?