Sander

Results 63 comments of Sander

Thanks! FWIW: after quite some time compiling, the result is there: a nzbget for/on RISC-V: ``` [root@fedora-riscv nzbget]# file nzbget nzbget: ELF 64-bit LSB executable, UCB RISC-V, version 1 (GNU/Linux),...

FWIW: Ubuntu on RISC-V / riscv64 contains nzbget in the repo's. So just `sudo apt install nzbget` and you're done. Nice. ``` sander@ubuntu:~$ which nzbget /usr/bin/nzbget sander@ubuntu:~$ dpkg -S /usr/bin/nzbget...

Ah, this is an easier / cleaner method to update posix/config.guess and posix/config.sub (based on https://github.com/easybuilders/easybuild-easyblocks/issues/1276#issuecomment-394239427 ): From the github nzbget directory: ``` sudo apt install automake -y aclocal automake...

`'/nzbget/nzbget' `, so in root. That is unusual for normal OSes. Are you nzbget running in docker? If so, which docker image from which creator?

Introduced on 2020-01-30 https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/fs/exec.c?id=47a2ebb7f5053387f5753b524f4920b9b829f922 with critcism on https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1164047/ > What are poor users supposed to do if this message comes out? > Hopefully google the message and end up at...

I upgraded my kernel to 5.7, and I did get once the warning in dmesg: ``` [ 592.745418] process 'sander/bla-nzbget/nzbget/nzbget' started with executable stack ``` To answer question from @hugbug...

Cool! Before that, did you get the `started with executable stack` once, often, or always? I'm asking because I only got it once ... EDIT: and: by looking at the...

> Added `-Wl,-z,noexecstack` to `AM_CPPFLAGS` in Makefile.am Which lines exactly? Can you share the diff? ``` $ grep -n AM_CPPFLAGS Makefile.am 238:AM_CPPFLAGS = \ 279:AM_CPPFLAGS += \ ```

Hey @satmandu Did you try the built-in tool `execstack`? Because that seems to do it all, without the need for the script. ``` $ execstack --help Usage: execstack [OPTION...] execstack...

Detecting is working, debug.warning is working, but nzo.fail_msg is not: it gets overwritten in postproc line 645 ... Tips how to avoid that? ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1273502/184478499-e742b06e-e561-447b-95ce-f68ba4a835cd.png) pycharm debugger: ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1273502/184478355-8edcb0be-5586-414e-9cc7-90602d5a2f21.png)