Samuel Lampa
Samuel Lampa
> My intention had been to run in a plain windows environment. Sadly, I've been a bit busy and this fell by the wayside. No worries at all! Mostly I...
@dwmunster wrote: > Is there a particular reason to shell out instead of just exec'ing directly? Sorry for the delay. Good question! The idea has generally been that the bash...
> Without much thought put into the consequences or work required, some options presented in no particular order: > > * We could add an executor interface where the default...
Congrats on opening the 100th issue @jonalv ;)
Thanks @ASVBPREAUBV , great suggestion! Probably it could be done with new methods with similar names, so that the signature of those methods can be kept, and to allow keeping...
Well, also, I'm not yet sure what are the pros and cons of process-level logging. In a way I think it sounds interesting ... but it should also be possible...
> My use case is a pipeline hooked to external triggers. So the pipeline runs all the time with different input files. I have to save my process logs in...
@dwmunster Ah, so, if I understand correctly, there is the problem that tags might be added/created after the folder hash is generated? Good catch!
Hi @zhangzhen , thanks for an interesting request! Indeed, just as @jonalv says, right now the main technique we have been using, is to monitor the file output to keep...
Hi @kwrobert and thanks for the input and kind words! This request is timely, as I'm looking at refactoring the IP (possibly corresponding to what you call "resource"?) into a...