Samuel Colvin

Good point, transferred. I think priority should definitely be respected in in nested models in V2.

I agree with the basic idea here, happy to review a PR. A few things to note here: * `os.environ` as a Mapping interface isn't quite enough in itself since...

Thanks, looks reasonable to me :+1:.

Interesting idea, to avoid confusion, I think we should have one correct implementation, then the existing route of [custom sources](https://pydantic-docs.helpmanual.io/usage/settings/#field-value-priority) for everything else. I don't think it's worth submitting a...

I'm pretty sure that if we create a separate package, it'll be called `pydantic-settings`. One of the changes I want to make in settings in V2 is to make all...

I'm not sure on your question, but will transfer.

Well this is embarrassing, after looking into `with_attrs_docs` it seems like it would actually make more sense to implement this in pydantic itself or in a separate library (if it...

Hi @bheisler thanks so much for your response. cc'ing @art049 as I know he's interested in this. Overall I get entirely where you're coming from, feedback on a few specific...

thanks so much.

Thanks so much. By the way, you can always re-run CI using `git commit -m bump --allow-empty`.