Samuel Colvin

I'm happy to fix it, or review a PR which fixes it, but I hoped you might come with a solution as well as a problem. Ideally that's how open...

Any fix will need to target V2, so might need to made in pydantic-core. One option would be a black list of attributes to ignore, would that work for you?

Looking at this again, there's a chance it's already fixed in pydantic-core as we only get the attributes required (unless you set extra=allow). Probably the first step would be to...

??? This is not a reason to yank anything.

any chance this is fixed by #4493?

> this is not a reason? In my opinion yanking is only for mistaken releases (immediately), malicious releases (if someone got your access keys), or very serious security threats e.g....

@dolfinus if this issue is urgent for you, why not try to fix it and create a PR? @PrettyWood and I would be happy to review it.

Hi @dolfinus as far as I know, you're the only person for whom this is urgent. So best if you create a pull request. Otherwise you'll need to wait for...

Have you tried on master? Might be fixed by #2557

Agreed, I think we can live without slots for v1.10.