Samuel Thiriot

Wow, that's quick o_O I'm pulling it to test it right now, I keep you posted! Sam

I did not yet achieved to produce complete populations when adding the parameter, but maybe I misunderstood how to use it? I tried: `myEvolutionTask hook SavePopulationHook(myEvolutionTask , workDirectory/"mysubdir", keepAll=true)` I'll...

I try your syntax right now. WIth the previous one, I got the standard result, the Pareto fronts, no change in behavior (yet the parameter was accepted at compilation)

Not better with the simpler syntax. I'm on this version of the image: ``` Pulling openmole (openmole/openmole:12.0-SNAPSHOT)... 12.0-SNAPSHOT: Pulling from openmole/openmole Digest: sha256:3c5cd74663e27661fbf034afa97a802405a9a2eb7e5899a304021f04b5047d9f Status: Image is up to date for...

(just to be sure I ran it with keepAll=false, it's not better)

Oh, just wondering if there is not a misunderstanding there. Did you meant all the individuals from the Pareto front are exported? Or do you mean, as I meant, that...

Yes, we are on the same basis, thanks. In the current result, it is clear the hook is exporting the first Pareto front as usual. Plotting one of the generation...

Mmm at least mutation and crossover should make novel points to appear here and there. But I'll share with you an oms so you have a reference testcase.

Hello again @JusteRaimbault , here is a test I use: ``` //model inputs val x = Val[Double] //model outputs val f1 = Val[Double] val f2 = Val[Double] // about the...

Dear all, after several updates of the openmole docker container, I tried again and confirm the `keepAll=true` flag works as expected. I donno why it did work in the past...