Sam Tobin-Hochstadt
Sam Tobin-Hochstadt
For writing a FAQ entry, I again think clarity about what you're referring to is important. The questions of "how do I get a traditional lisp REPL" and "how do...
It's https://blog.racket-lang.org/2009/03/the-drscheme-repl-isnt-the-one-in-emacs.html
Do you have "Debugging" on in the language menu? What happens if you turn it off?
I think the fix here is that the errortrace annotator should just skip modules that are cross-phase persistent.
If it's not bound at the use site, can we make the error message describe how to get it?
My feeling is that the magic isn't so bad here, and in keeping with other areas of Racket where similar magic happens: `in-range` in `for` loops, keyword argument function warnings....
Just a note that a new Racketeer was confused by this issue today.
I think this is something that would benefit from writing down the RFC as part of this process.
Is there a reason not to make this a new package?
That's some of the most fragile code in TR. Is that test using the old alias or the new name?