Jeongho Nam

Then which namespace do you want? `typia.functional.guard(async (value: T1): Promise => {})` would be okay?

Upgrade to v5.5 and use like this: https://typia.io/docs/validators/functional/

What about using this way? - transformer: https://github.com/samchon/nestia/blob/master/packages/core/src/transformers/ParameterDecoratorTransformer.ts - detailed programmer: https://github.com/samchon/nestia/blob/master/packages/core/src/programmers/TypedBodyProgrammer.ts - target function to be transformed: https://github.com/samchon/nestia/blob/master/packages/core/src/decorators/TypedBody.ts - spec of the function: https://nestia.io/docs/core/TypedBody/

Welcome your PR

Upgrade to v6, then be ready.

You've defined an intersection type of string and constant string literal type. Following the definition of the intersection type, it is not bug, but a spec. As `string` covers the...

How about use `unplugin-typia` so that avoid the generation? I have no clear way to solve this problem. https://typia.io/docs/setup/#unplugin-typia

No idea how to. `typia` is generating nested validator functions per each object types. Your idea seems good, but I don't have idea how to declare the type definition. As...

How about this feature? `typia` had supported `typia`'s own schema structure, but I've not documented it yet, due to no one had interested in. ```typescript import { metadata } from...

> +1. My use case is to use `FormData.get` without having to hardcode field names. > > This was a handy feature in Zod: > > ``` > export function...