Salim Fadhley
Salim Fadhley
@lechat did this one ever get merged?
Anything I can do to test this hypothesis? Just to clarify - the system I am running on is kinda odd. It's an Asustor NAS which provides a very bare-bones...
Portainer is just a dockerized GUI for managing docker. I'm not using it in this circumstance. It's what I'd like to use. It's a very common way for self-hosting apps....
Just to be clear, in your dockerfile you can have: ```dockerfile FROM --platform=linux/amd64 python:${PYTHON_VERSION}-slim-bullseye as python_stuff ... python build instructions FROM go:latest AS go_stuff ... go stuff ``` And then...
> I will publish the image, and anyone can just run the finished product. No one needs to build from source, they just pull the single image. I don't think...
> 2\. ship some weird systemd-in-docker solution with a single published docker image, which has all the right defaults, and people can just pull down and run I'm curious about...
FYI, I've discovered a likely cause - user error: When building docker in docker, bind mounts refer to paths in the host-system, not the inner system.
Just a request: One thing that would make this project way more accessible is if it could work in Portainer, a widely used tool for launching containerized applications. Asustor NAS...
We started with a simple symptom: indexing was succeeding (FastIndexingWorker reported success), but nothing was getting auto‑enqueued for download. The logs consistently said “Current batch of media processed” with zero...
I think I found what was causing this, it was a faulty life cycle script.