salaboy
@theonefx can you please create an issue, so we can reference in the PR? I would love to understand a bit better the scenario that you are trying to cover...
@theonefx yeah please.. we need an issue with context so we can review this PR and understand why you need these changes..
@theonefx any updates on this?
@TheForbiddenAi @siri-varma I have some issues with this idea. I believe that the task name needs to be propagated to the runtime to keep track of the task name. Not...
What I meant is that the task name is something more general than just the retry mechanism, hence just adding the task name for the retry mechanism feels wrong to...
I haven't reviewed this yet @lony2003 , but I am more convinced that we need this .. @artur-ciocanu @mcruzdev can you help me to check this PR ?
@lony2003 I've just reviewed this PR and it is looking awesome.. I am currently working on testing multiple sidecars using Testcontainers (for service to service invocation) scenarios, so I will...
@lony2003 I am happy to see the CI happy for this PR, can you check the codecov?
@dapr/maintainers-java-sdk I believe that we can merge this PR, we will incrementally improve the quality of this PR, but I want this module to be present in the SDK. Please...
I really want this merged too, but I am not a maintainer