Philipp Ossler

[0067-feel-split-function] The regex usage differences from the DMN specification

4

## Description The test case [0067-feel-split-function: 001](https://github.com/dmn-tck/tck/blob/master/TestCases/compliance-level-3/0067-feel-split-function/0067-feel-split-function-test-01.xml#L10-L24) verifies the usage of the `split()` function with a regex argument. The [DMN](https://github.com/dmn-tck/tck/blob/master/TestCases/compliance-level-3/0067-feel-split-function/0067-feel-split-function.dmn#L9-L17) evaluates the following FEEL expression: ``` split("John Doe", "\s") ```...

**Describe the bug** The FEEL engine fails to parse a nested for-loop expression: ``` context merge( for entry in for kvPair in (for kvPair in split(rawContent, "\n") return kvPair) return...

**Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.** In the context of BPMN, I want to write a FEEL expression that contains some form of validation logic. Similar...

## Description In some cases, I have a FEEL expression with a for-loop and need to get the current element's index. There is a trick: `count(partial)` calculates the current index....

I can read how to use BPMN compensation event subprocesses

2

## Description With Camunda 8.7 (potentially), we will add support for BPMN compensation event subprocesses. We need to extend the documentation of BPMN compensation events for the usage of compensation...

## Description Add a tip about for-loops on how to retrieve the index of the current element.  closes #5334 ## When should this change go live? - [ ]...

## Description Add the new assertion `hasNoActiveIncidents()` to the CPT [documentation](https://docs.camunda.io/docs/next/apis-tools/testing/assertions/).

## Description Add the new assertion `hasActiveIncidents()` to the CPT [documentation](https://docs.camunda.io/docs/next/apis-tools/testing/assertions/).