saicaca
feat: add post pinning functionality
- Add pinned field to post schema and frontmatter
- Implement sorting logic to prioritize pinned posts
- Display pin icon for pinned posts in main blog and archive views
- Update documentation in README files with pinned feature details
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
| Name | Status | Preview | Comments | Updated (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| fuwari-yags | ✅ Ready (Inspect) | Visit Preview | 💬 Add feedback | May 1, 2025 2:59pm |
![vercel[bot] avatar](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/8329?v=4 "Published by a pub.dev verified publisher"){kind=small}
Adding PR history: https://github.com/saicaca/fuwari/pull/422 CC @L4Ph
As in https://github.com/saicaca/fuwari/discussions/356, currently new feature will not be merged. So pending on repo owner when repo owner is back.
@L4Ph It is quite long time, may you consider creating another repo for merging these new features to see the outcome when they are being implemented?
As in #356, currently new feature will not be merged. So pending on repo owner when repo owner is back.
I see, it's not a big problem, it's just a small feature improvement, we can take it slow.
@L4Ph It is quite long time, may you consider creating another repo for merging these new features to see the outcome when they are being implemented?
I think this would be a good suggestion. Time waits for no one, once it's delayed too long, there will be more PRs, and merging the code will become almost impossible.
Maybe we can create a new repo or branch to merge these PRs first.
Let's say you merge that "new feature" into another repository.
- Who will maintain the differences with saicaca/main?
- When should you issue a pull request from that repository to saicaca/main?
- Who should be credited with a pull request for a similar feature?
There are many things to consider. I don't have the time or confidence to maintain two repositories that are similar but have different implementations.
I don't think there's much to be gained from discussing this further here, so let's move on to the discussion below...
#434
