Sabrina Toro

Discussion: - #5387 : proposed strategy - explanation [here](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6aFufszAa_g) - Comments from Chris (copied from Slack) - we want to add the disjointness ASAP as that will reveal issues Discussion:...

no progress to report. I looked at the list, and I am investigating how we could bring the whole non-human neoplasm branch into mondo. It will take some time.

@jagcsun I am assigning this issue to you as you are the Cerebral Palsy expert. If you want, I am happy to make the changes in Protege if you determine...

@nicolevasilevsky could you make sure that obsoleting these terms would make sense? Note to self, we will need to figure out parentage for some children of these terms

**children of "head disorder", potential more terms to obsolete:** MONDO ID | labels | obsoletion reason | issue? -- | -- | -- | -- MONDO:0002022 | disorder of orbital...

@nicolevasilevsky How should we ding the "susceptibility" terms? Are we expecting these terms to have "susceptibility" in their label? in synonyms? Note that we might get false positive (ie terms...

@nicolevasilevsky Here is the query reporting all terms with "susceptibility" in its label and/or in the exact synonym. (At least I think?) https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1aFKn_1ybz4w23_4kvZo0uv_WahL-OcglS4Wsuf-56ek/edit?usp=sharing Sparql query: https://api.triplydb.com/s/CR6y9XqFN I will attend to...

Updated the query (added the report in the google doc, see tab "not in Mondo:0020573") Sparql query: https://api.triplydb.com/s/9DJbSWDue

Before making changes in the ontology, I want to make sure that these changes will not change the meaning of the current concept, in which case, we should create a...

Hi @tibingaman, just checking whether you had a chance to check with your experts. Thank you!