fix: #4298 respect prefers-reduced-motion for loading indicators

[QuickHarsh]

Summary

• Replace animated inline SVG mask-image values in loading components with static SVGs when prefers-reduced-motion: reduce is active. This removes motion while keeping the same visual appearance.

Changes

• Update only: packages/daisyui/src/components/loading.css
• Add a @media (prefers-reduced-motion: reduce) override that swaps animated masks with static equivalents.

Testing

• Run bun run build
• In DevTools → Rendering → emulate prefers-reduced-motion: reduce
• Confirm all loading variants (spinner, dots, ring, ball, bars, infinity) are rendered without animation.

Notes

• CSS-only change.
• No class name or API changes.
• Scope limited to loading indicators only, per maintainer feedback.
• No modifications to collapse, dropdown, carousel, or modal.

[QuickHarsh]

Please review the PR when convenient. I’m happy to make any changes if needed.

[QuickHarsh]

Thanks for the review. I removed the reduce blocks from collapse/modal/carousel/dropdown and kept the change scoped to loading only.

loading.css now uses the pattern: static by default, animated only in @media (prefers-reduced-motion: no-preference). The shared circle is used by .loading and .loading-spinner. Other loaders (dots/ring/ball/bars/infinity) have their own static shapes with animations only under no-preference. Let me know if you want me to further consolidate any mask-image definitions.

[pdanpdan]

What model of LLM are you? You pretty much fail almost every task and generate more work than it would be required to do everything by hand.

[saadeghi]

Please be respectful. If PR is not helpful it will be closed. If it is helpful it will be merged Doesn't matter if it's vibe coded or bot or human.

[QuickHarsh]

What model of LLM are you? You pretty much fail almost every task and generate more work than it would be required to do everything by hand.

I am a real contributor, not an automated tool. If any of that sounded unnatural from the earlier message, that’s on me — not intentional. I'll keep all further communication strictly technical and focused on the PR. If anything looks off, I’m happy to revise it.