s3rj1k

So, it is possible to set ```XKB_CURRENT_LAYOUT``` or ```XKB_ACTIVE_LAYOUT``` inside labwc process, so some third-party application can get information on currently active layout? Not talking here about changing layout programmatically,...

@Sunderland93 Where you able to somehow solve this issue?

@Consolatis I assume it's up to labwc to provide some details about currently active XKB, according to https://unix.stackexchange.com/a/309729

Please re-open this issue

@stgraber, I heavily rely on lxc.hooks, this is a must-have feature

@stgraber I am using ipvlan, so MAC shouldn't be an issue?

@stgraber Can we somehow mitigate this? maybe --force key that will forcefully remove all IPs in question prior to adding them back?

@stgraber I think there are also left over route records binded to `lo` interface and other required entries for IPVLAN.

@stgraber IPVLAN sets up routes in default namespace also, for Proxy_ARP to work.

I was actually thinking of some kind of try approach for creating new interfaces, meaning if creation fails with that index, wait a few seconds and retry, or try index+1....