Sebastian Weigand
Sebastian Weigand
Thanks for the suggestion, I will use this answer as a kind of whiteboard for myself. But your solution would be for the user to implement in their workflow, while...
@all-contributors please add @wvxvw for bug
Sorry for the late reply and thx @basic-ph for helping @UnHumbleBen in the mean time. __Concerning the `conda activate ` usage:__ As @basic-ph already said, at the momemnt the way...
Hmmm I get a 404 error, is it a private repo?
@basic-ph Also maybe open a separate issue 😉 You can post the workflow and the error code there. Adding the language of a code block, also helps a lot 😄
Thanks for providing the bug as well as the current fix at the same time 😃 Since activation of the `base` env does work across steps (`activate-conda: true`), my guess...
Just as a future reference, when I finally got time to implement those changes 😞 @BtbN You are correct, and the reason why it still partially works is due to...
@all-contributors please add @basic-ph for bug
First of all thanks for the awesome tool ❤️ Since you were interested in how to gather the coverage reports this is my hacky approach for GitHub-Actions. The problem with...
@joerick Sorry for the late reply. Since `coverage.py` should now properly support relative paths (https://github.com/nedbat/coveragepy/issues/1147) my `update_coverag_file` hack shouldn't be needed anymore. As an alternative to using the output folder,...