Aaryamann Challani

We're tracking the nwaku update here - https://github.com/waku-org/nwaku/issues/1451. I can take it up after we're done with https://github.com/waku-org/nwaku/pull/1457

Agreed, general format for inputs is not necessarily "safe", and each circuit should have their own api. Closing this issue.

We can split this issue into another to describe the zerokit cli, and close this one to wrap up for the v0.2 release, wdyt?

Addressed in https://github.com/vacp2p/zerokit/pull/120 and split into #71

Yes! this sounds good to me @tyshko-rostyslav, thanks for that. Please note that there may be some duplicated work with https://github.com/Rate-Limiting-Nullifier/rln-cli We can do 2 things - - develop the...

I would prefer if this serves as a larger tracking issue, but if it makes things easier, please feel free to close it :)

We can close this issue since the MVP is done! cc: @rahulghangas

Thanks for the issue @weboko! We need to test 1 thing initially, if proofs generated by rln-wasm are able to be verified by the rln verifier, and vice versa (due...

Please also add some description to your PR, and link back to the issue in which this was assigned to you

addressed in all the PRs mentioned above, and released on crates.io, github too.