Ryan Carniato

@lxsmnsyc can you comment on this?

Ok then lets move this to refresh.

Hmm.. I know why this is happening, and we could definitely document this better. Honestly, I copied Vue's implementation here which may not have been the best reference. It comes...

I didn't write this plugin so I can't speak to it. But assuming we don't do the TS conversion the expectation is the downstream tool does? Can we make that...

Hmm.. vite seems to be doing this themselves even when we don't pass development as a condition to the compiler.

Is it related to this PR perhaps: https://github.com/solidjs/vite-plugin-solid/pull/101

We've fixed some stuff around testing config in the latest. Can anyone confirm if this is still an issue?

`isSSR` means currently ssr transform happening and `options.ssr` means enable building ssr output So logic would be.. ```js const generate = isSSR ? "ssr" : "dom"; // or maybe `options.ssr...

I agree. That's part of the problem though. Since I don't even know what isn't here. Which is part of why I haven't tried to make something that is full-featured....