Ross Blair

> Hi @rwblair , My takeaway from this maintainers meeting was that it wasn't decided, and will be raised again next time after some community consultation (@sappelhoff). There's definitely concern...

Sorted `[ ] -> boolean` seems fine to me. If we add a new function for every rule I suppose it'd still be a win over the old way of...

Ah I forgot that `==` was defined for arrays. Works for me.

Should live in bids stats model zoo

Or generate error if fewer than 2 valid files

@sjeung I'm not seeing any checks for the `orientation_component` in the node validator. We didn't have something like json schema to make this easy so any checks on values outside...

No problem, should really be added as an option to the package.json. Full command I ran was: `eslint --fix \"./bids-validator/{tests,utils,validators}/**/*.js\"` No need to worry about deno tests, they're failing on...

Tested with bids-standard/bids-examples#348, everything looks good to me. We have a maintainers call later today so I'll wait until after that to pull the trigger on the merge.

Associations are currently being loaded synchronously on context loading.

Made a metadata.yml for the validator and opened a pr against conda-forge: https://github.com/conda-forge/staged-recipes/pull/9771