Rick Waldron
Rick Waldron
@Ms2ger Philip is worried about having two sets of tests going out of sync during development. We're worried about a massive deluge of test material that does not have well...
> On the other hand, having them in this repo would be very helpful for the people who are implementing the proposal as we speak. This is actually really compelling....
@marjakh lets also add @Ms2ger @romulocintra @ryzokuken
This looks good to me. Nice work identifying this and coming up with a straight forward solution. I have two questions: 1. Safe to assume we will do a new...
Sorry for the delay... I'm actually not sure how to answer that last question :|
That's a lot to read. The only important thing I want to say is that you're not solely responsible for writing the tests. You can lean on the maintainers here...
I think the issue is that you see what you believe to be a problem, but which is not a problem—in fact it's all very intentional, to serve a very...
> I don't understand the argument that there's no problem to solve. Cool, because no one said that. I said that the thing @ptomato is describing as a problem, ie....
cc @Ms2ger @romulocintra @sarahghp @ryzokuken @ptomato Is this something any of you want to tackle?
> fwiw, I've found that test runners that do _not_ throw exceptions on failures are much easier to work with, precisely because one failure doesn't prevent you from receiving further...