Raphaël Valyi

hum, ainda tem uma treta parra resolver com o mock... ``` File "/__w/l10n-brazil/l10n-brazil/l10n_br_crm_cnpj_search/wizard/partner_cnpj_search_wizard.py", line 11, in default_get res = super().default_get(fields) File "/__w/l10n-brazil/l10n-brazil/l10n_br_cnpj_search/wizard/partner_cnpj_search_wizard.py", line 119, in default_get values = self._get_partner_values(cnpj_cpf) File...

botei um print para depurar e fico com duvidas, temos esses erros: ``` 2025-04-09 13:29:57,717 437 INFO odoo odoo.addons.l10n_br_cnpj_search.tests.test_serpro: Starting TestTestSerPro.test_serpro_basica ... 2025-04-09 13:29:59,582 437 INFO odoo odoo.addons.l10n_br_cnpj_search.tests.test_serpro: Starting TestTestSerPro.test_serpro_empresa...

ok obrigado pela explicação. Mas enfim falta adaptar o teste mesmo então...

Please @OCA/accounting-maintainers , don't merge this too quickly and read @mbcosta remarks and mine in https://github.com/OCA/account-invoicing/pull/1025 . Indeed it would be much better if stock_picking_invoicing wouldn't carry a hard dependency...

@mbcosta I believe something great could be migrate stock_picking_invoice_link to v17 making it fully independent from sale and create a new `sale_stock_picking_invoice_link` in the same mood as `purchase_stock_picking_invoice_link` this would...

important: after Odoo v15, project_milestone is removed from the OCA as it became a native feature. so not sure it's worth adding this module in v14. See https://github.com/OCA/project/pull/1268

ai viu @mbcosta agora eu botei uns testes com emissão de boleto pelo container. Aind vou olhar o PR, mas ja da para ficar mais tranquilo.

então agora que ta no Alpine a gente pode sim ver de botar na OCA tb. Mas eu diria que seria bom começar na branch 16 e talvez fazer um...

for reference the 2 breaking changes and main feature in the stock module for 18.0: https://github.com/akretion/odoo-module-diff-analysis/tree/main/18.0/stock

@carlos-domatix may be you should ping the recent contributors to approve this...