rust-windowing
Prefer `[foo][bar]` over `[foo](bar)` for intra-doc links
Follow-up to a discussion here: https://github.com/rust-windowing/winit/pull/3178#discussion_r1371280634.
The logic here is that [foo](bar) can be used for inline links or intra-doc links, but [foo][bar] can be used for labels or intra-doc links, so if no label is present, it can only be a intra-doc link, making this less ambiguous and more robust to error check.
For reference: still waiting for some feedback in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/117178.
Apparently the conclusion was that there is no preference: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/121021.
I also double checked and AFAICT Rustdoc will properly generate an error regardless. So the only difference is that []() will generate a dead link but [][] will not, but its not really an issue because CI should always catch it.
Personally I would still prefer [foo][bar] over [foo](bar) despite there not being any official recommendation by Rustdoc but us being consistent in Winit. So if we have consensus I would still like to move forward with this.