option1.rs is too easy to pass

[thiskevinwang]

Description

Total-beyond-newbie here, but I noticed option1.rs is too easy to pass.

This passes the test:

pub fn pop_too_much() -> bool {
    let mut list = vec![3];

    let last = list.pop().unwrap();
    println!("The last item in the list is {:?}", last);

-   let second_to_last = list.pop().unwrap();
+   let second_to_last = list.pop(); 
    println!(
        "The second-to-last item in the list is {:?}",
        second_to_last
    );
    true
}

Maybe there's some opportunity for a better test? I'm forcing myself to read the hints, just so I can understand/learn the lesson to be had in this file. 😅

Feel free to close if this is not helpful for for rustlings, or the community!

[Zoldszemesostoros]

I've just noticed this: if you try to compile variables6.rs, the compiler tells the solution.

[lynoure]

As there is two option1 exercises, which is weird as there can be only one hint, I assume this errors/option1.rs is an accidental leftover from the time before there was a whole section for Option.

[muisje]

Error_Handling/option1.rs is not included in rustlings watch. So i suppose Lynoure is right.