Async-tokio DelayNs implementation inaccurate for delays shorter than a few ms

[eldruin]

hey fyi tokio::time::sleep is only good down to ms resolutions, for more granularity we typically need something nanosleep or a hot loop, so this implementation won't be accurate for anything less than a couple of ms.

having had to solve this a couple of times i suspect a more accurate way to do this would involve using epoll_wait with a timeout for > 1us delays (more accurate kernel timing than sleep is, particularly under the tokio runtime) and a hot loop over Instant::elapsed() for > 1ns delays (check elapsed and hit the waker every round).

possibly combining both into something like:

let now = Instant::now()
loop {
  // Grab elapsed at the start of the loop
  let elapsed = now.elapsed();

  // Break once we exceed the delay duration
  if elapsed > duration {
    break;
  }

  // Calculate the remaining sleep time
  let remainder = duration - elapsed;

  // epoll or spin depending on remainder
  if remainder > Duration::from_millis(1) {
    epoll_sleep().await;
  } else {
    spin_sleep().await;
  }
}

some folks do more complex things to balance accuracy and cpu use, but, this is fairly straightforward and would be closer to operating as intended. (it's also good to keep track of elapsed times because there are reasons a sleep might end early, which has caused problems for me in the past)

Originally posted by @ryankurte in https://github.com/rust-embedded/linux-embedded-hal/issues/109#issuecomment-1913732707