Is this plugin still maintained?

[gaetanquentin]

No commit since 2014: is this plugin still maintained?

[gaetanquentin]

since there is no answer, i think it is not.

[ghost]

Its better to return the response code/format from the salt master to rundeck for any custom module or built in module.

On Wed, Aug 22, 2018, 18:44 Gaétan QUENTIN [email protected] wrote:

since there is no answer, i think not.

— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/rundeck-plugins/salt-step/issues/25#issuecomment-415027292, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ATKJO8pEjCaGZiUFDHJ8ooCOyMFENnowks5uTVkzgaJpZM4Vhj8W .

[gaetanquentin]

Can you argue, i think i haven't understood? Thanks.

[ghost]

Rundeck code doesn't have the capability to format the return response of methods running on salt master, instead the return response can be formatted in the way rundeck salt plugin accepts. For example, when we execute an unix command, the return response is in the same format which rundeck code accepts.

On Wed, Aug 22, 2018, 20:25 Gaétan QUENTIN [email protected] wrote:

Can you argue, i think i haven't understood? Thanks.

— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/rundeck-plugins/salt-step/issues/25#issuecomment-415061520, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ATKJO4Ycs_fzmOd2tw1geOdTlN1t3nyEks5uTXDdgaJpZM4Vhj8W .

[G3NSVRV]

+1

[asusk7m550]

I have created a start with a replacement plugin written in python. It used the same methods and variable names and should be a drop-in replacement of this module.

Please have a look at https://github.com/asusk7m550/salt-step