llama_index icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
llama_index copied to clipboard

[Question]: Is it possible integrate langchain ConversationBufferMemory ?

Open sura2k opened this issue 10 months ago • 5 comments

Question Validation

  • [X] I have searched both the documentation and discord for an answer.

Question

Is it possible to integrate langchain ConversationBufferMemory with llama-index chat engine? I'm checking on this because current llama-index ChatMemoryBuffer is not sufficient.

sura2k avatar Apr 15 '24 13:04 sura2k

Integrating langchain ConversationBufferMemory with the llama-index chat engine is indeed feasible. This process involves creating an adapter or bridge that allows llama-index to leverage langchain's ConversationBufferMemory for enhanced memory management. Specifically, you would need to either extend the BaseMemory class or develop a new class that adheres to the BaseMemory interface expected by llama-index, but internally utilizes langchain's memory management features.

To start, examine the BaseMemory class in llama-index for an understanding of the required interface and then look into how ConversationBufferMemory operates within langchain. This approach will enable you to incorporate langchain's advanced memory management capabilities into llama-index, potentially overcoming limitations you've encountered with the current ChatMemoryBuffer.

If you're addressing specific limitations of the ChatMemoryBuffer, such as token limit constraints, message role handling, or serialization issues, a tailored solution focusing on those aspects would be more effective. Understanding the exact features or capabilities you need will help in providing a more precise integration strategy.

For a successful integration, closely follow the implementation patterns and interface requirements outlined in llama-index's memory management system, adapting langchain's ConversationBufferMemory functionalities within that framework.

Sources

About Dosu

This response is meant to be useful and save you time. It is not meant to be a precise solution, but rather a starting point for your own research.

Help me be more useful! Please leave a 👍 if this is helpful and 👎 if it is irrelevant.

If you want to continue the conversation, start your reply with @dosu-bot.

dosubot[bot] avatar Apr 15 '24 13:04 dosubot[bot]

@sura2k its not possible currently, but could maybe be possible.

I'm curious what ChatMemoryBuffer lacks that you need?

logan-markewich avatar Apr 15 '24 15:04 logan-markewich

@logan-markewich sorry for late reply. I'm actually having a requirement to use something similar to ConversationSummaryBufferMemory

sura2k avatar Apr 17 '24 14:04 sura2k

We would also like something along the lines of ConversationSummaryBufferMemory to be implemented in LlamaIndex. The reason is that for our use case, we want to keep latency and costs down for our end users. Using the full history up to the context length increases costs and latency for each follow-up question due to increased number of tokens. Limiting the memory to the last X messages works, but is suboptimal, because the older messages may still have relevance. We would like older messages < X to be summarized, then appended by the full text of the last X messages.

@logan-markewich I can contribute to this if you are okay with adding this into LlamaIndex

shadyelgewily-slimstock avatar Apr 25 '24 08:04 shadyelgewily-slimstock

Yea go for it

logan-markewich avatar Apr 25 '24 18:04 logan-markewich