feat: add slack source
What are the changes introduced in this PR?
Adds Slack source transform
Research doc - https://www.notion.so/rudderstacks/Slack-Source-integration-119cd4bd3d9c466fb875c10dc77fc719?pvs=4
Please explain the objectives of your changes below
Put down any required details on the broader aspect of your changes. If there are any dependent changes, mandatorily mention them here
Any changes to existing capabilities/behaviour, mention the reason & what are the changes ?
No
Any new dependencies introduced with this change?
No
Any new generic utility introduced or modified. Please explain the changes.
No
Any technical or performance related pointers to consider with the change?
N
@coderabbitai review
Developer checklist
-
[x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
-
[x] No breaking changes are being introduced.
-
[x] All related docs linked with the PR?
-
[x] All changes manually tested?
-
[x] Any documentation changes needed with this change?
-
[x] Is the PR limited to 10 file changes?
-
[x] Is the PR limited to one linear task?
-
[ ] Are relevant unit and component test-cases added?
Reviewer checklist
-
[ ] Is the type of change in the PR title appropriate as per the changes?
-
[ ] Verified that there are no credentials or confidential data exposed with the changes.
[!IMPORTANT]
Auto Review Skipped
Auto reviews are disabled on this repository.
Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the
.coderabbit.yamlfile in this repository.To trigger a single review, invoke the
@coderabbitai reviewcommand.
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?
Tips
Chat
There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
- Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.Generate unit-tests for this file.Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
- Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag
@coderabbitaiin a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:@coderabbitai generate unit tests for this file.@coderabbitai modularize this function.
- PR comments: Tag
@coderabbitaiin a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:@coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.@coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit tests.@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.
CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
@coderabbitai pauseto pause the reviews on a PR.@coderabbitai resumeto resume the paused reviews.@coderabbitai reviewto trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.@coderabbitai resolveresolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.@coderabbitai helpto get help.
Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)
- You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a
.coderabbit.yamlfile to the root of your repository. - The JSON schema for the configuration file is available here.
- If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation:
# yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json
CodeRabbit Discord Community
Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
Test report for this run is available at: https://test-integrations-dev.s3.amazonaws.com/integrations-test-reports/rudder-transformer/3148/test-report.html
Codecov Report
Attention: Patch coverage is 92.18750% with 5 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.
Project coverage is 87.88%. Comparing base (
be0e5f5) to head (d16752b). Report is 1 commits behind head on develop.
| Files | Patch % | Lines |
|---|---|---|
| src/v0/sources/slack/transform.js | 89.58% | 5 Missing :warning: |
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop #3148 +/- ##
========================================
Coverage 87.87% 87.88%
========================================
Files 558 560 +2
Lines 30062 30126 +64
Branches 7194 7212 +18
========================================
+ Hits 26418 26477 +59
+ Misses 3341 3318 -23
- Partials 303 331 +28
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
Quality Gate passed
Issues
1 New issue
0 Accepted issues
Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code
@shrouti1507 added you too for a review if time permits
Are we adding tests in this PR?
I wrote some tests on local but facing difficulties in verifying those on my local machine. Need suggestions on how to move forward.
This PR is considered to be stale. It has been open for 20 days with no further activity thus it is going to be closed in 7 days. To avoid such a case please consider removing the stale label manually or add a comment to the PR.
Quality Gate passed
Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues
Measures
0 Security Hotspots
88.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code
Tested on prod. This is working fine.