[Investigation] Child. Should we be able to have both active and archived (as we have now)? It seems to me that either you are active or archived.

Shouldn't it only be Active OR Archived?
We should find out if any banks' partners are actively relying on a distinction between these as two separate booleans. Our current bank user group likely won't be informative here since they actively discourage / disallow specifying request by child.
Are enough users relying on this that it even is worth 'fixing'?
Edwin found that it was added in https://github.com/rubyforgood/partner/pull/128 when we were still working with 2 separate apps.
It looks like archived is used for aged-out kids.
Let's see if people are using it, and for the right reason. (Back on CL)
This issue is marked as stale due to no activity within 30 days. If no further activity is detected within 7 days, it will be unassigned.
Automatically unassigned after 7 days of inactivity.