Categorization: usergroups & conferences

[1000miles]

@PragTob cc @lauralindal @hagenburger @skade

Hey there, what is the purpose of these categories

usergroups
conferences

in the supporters.json when they are finally not displayed on the website? As far as I can see we currently don't have a proper order, right? Should we fix this?

[1000miles]

@skade If you work on this ticket, could also please take care of ticket https://github.com/rubyberlin/code-of-conduct/issues/43? So the categorization/sorting can be done in a row? :)

[PragTob]

Actually not sure when/how this got introduced :sweat_smile:

Hm was already in the very first commit by @hagenburger - 21671e461519b84dc

I guess separating them in the view would be nice but not super duper needed :)

[hagenburger]

We expected the list to grow (as it did) and this would have been a possibility to split up the list.

[hagenburger]

As it might be confusing where to put new user groups/conferences (our JSON file is big), I suggest splitting up supporters.json into usergroups.json and conferences.json and simplify the JSON structure. Otherwise people might just add their user group at the end of the file which might result being listed as a conference later on.

[1000miles]

Thanks, I am voting for yes. :)

Referencing the request for organisations as well: (https://github.com/rubyberlin/code-of-conduct/issues/43)