`rake annotate`

[ParadoxV5]

The rest of rake annotate changes from a184eda & dc59809

[ParadoxV5]

The files were generated with Ruby 3.2.2.

[soutaro]

@ParadoxV5 Can you explain where the diffs come from? (It looks like CI generates the old docs.)

[ParadoxV5]

I’ve identified the deviation. When I ran bundle exec rake annotate, the script fails at the line bundle exec rbs annotate --no-system --no-gems --no-site --no-home -d /tmp/rdoc-3.2.2 core stdlib:

bundler: failed to load command: rbs (/usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/3.2.0/bin/rbs)
<internal:/usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/3.2.0/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb>:37:in `require': cannot load such file -- rbs_extension (LoadError)

Thus in order to publish the PRs associated with the aforementioned commits, I ran rbs annotate --no-system --no-gems --no-site --no-home -d /tmp/rdoc-3.2.2 core stdlib without bundle exec. The more up-to-date gems in my system may be the cause of these extra diffs.

Since you have prompted a further investigation into these, I have retraced the steps. I noticed that replacing rbs with exe/rbs does not make a difference. That is, the LoadError still raises with a manually run of bundle exec exe/rbs annotate --no-system --no-gems --no-site --no-home -d /tmp/rdoc-3.2.2 core stdlib, and the diffs still generate with exe/rbs annotate --no-system --no-gems --no-site --no-home -d /tmp/rdoc-3.2.2 core stdlib.

[ParadoxV5]

Checking the bundle install logs, I noticed that every fetch/install line is for older versions of dependent gems. What’s the dep update guideline for this project?

[soutaro]

Thanks for the investigation. It seems because of the version difference between your local gems and locked gems.

I recently found the rbs annotate code depending on RDoc has some potential problems. And plan to fix them in next version.

[ParadoxV5]

Obsolete, except maybe #issuecomment-1683366042