Ruben Taelman

> Ah, I read into the resolution and it actually appears that this feature is not planned for RDF? It is in fact going to be included (https://w3c.github.io/rdf-concepts/spec/#dfn-dir-lang-string). That specific...

@tpluscode [The issue has been resolved](https://github.com/w3c/rdf-concepts/issues/79#issuecomment-2573426952). Do you agree with merging this PR here?

I think option 2 is the only correct one, since RDF-star only defines nested triples (= quads in the default graph), but doesn't define triples in named graphs. > Make...

``` GRAPH :g { :p :o } ``` Note that the above does not mean that the triple `:a :b :c` _exists_ (in `:g` or somewhere else). It means that...

> I would not like to make this thread philosophical, but clearly, that triple does exist, doesn't it? :) No, not at all, that's the whole point of quoted triples...

I agree with all of the above @jeswr and @woutermont!

I don't know enough myself about entailment rules, but perhaps @phochste and @joachimvh might be interested in this.

@jeswr Up until now, all RDF/JS typings that were defined, were defined in a spec first. Similarly, we're defining some [new query-related interfaces](https://github.com/rdfjs/query-spec/pulls). Once there is consensus around the spec,...

All of this is actually intentional, see https://github.com/rdfjs/data-model-spec/pull/165

> Is there a reason the places I linked say Quad rather than Term? Not really, just needs an update I guess. Feel free to submit a PR! :-)