Russ Cox

The new API in [https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/591997/8/api/next/67434.txt](https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/591997/8/api/next/67434.txt) looks great. How do you feel about the implementation as far as being confident the API is right? How are the tests?

There is an interesting question about what happens when creating a timer or timer channel outside the bubble and then using it inside the bubble, or vice versa (or move...

See https://www.reddit.com/r/golang/comments/46bd5h/ama_we_are_the_go_contributors_ask_us_anything/d03t6ji/?st=ixp2gf04&sh=7d6920db for some past discussion to be aware of.

Agreed that #47448 is not fundamental to emitting undefined references to things in other packages. In this case, however, the object file has no need to mention `sync/atomic.Pointer[interface {}].CompareAndSwap` at...

@neild has been investigating similar issues. There's something useful to do here, but I'm not sure this exact API is it.

This proposal has been added to the [active column](https://go.dev/s/proposal-status#active) of the proposals project and will now be reviewed at the weekly proposal review meetings. — rsc for the proposal review...

It seems like closing this as a duplicate of #67434 is reasonable.

I agree that the two proposals have differences, but it seems clear we are only going to do one. The issues you list seem like downsides of this proposal to...

Based on the discussion above, this proposal seems like a **[likely decline](https://go.dev/s/proposal-status#likely-decline)**. — rsc for the proposal review group

No change in consensus, so **[declined](https://go.dev/s/proposal-status#declined)**. — rsc for the proposal review group