Russ Cox

Have all remaining concerns about this proposal been addressed? The proposal is to add: ``` // Comparable returns the hash of comparable value v with the given seed // such...

Based on the discussion above, this proposal seems like a **[likely accept](https://go.dev/s/proposal-status#likely-accept)**. — rsc for the proposal review group The proposal is to add: ``` // Comparable returns the hash...

@cherrymui points out that we didn't circle back to what to do with adding a Comparable to an existing *Hash state. I had written above that we'd need a generic...

No change in consensus, so **[accepted](https://go.dev/s/proposal-status#accepted)**. 🎉 This issue now tracks the work of implementing the proposal. — rsc for the proposal review group The proposal is to add: ```...

I marked this accept accidentally. We still need to figure out how to add a comparable to an existing hash. The best option seems to be: func WriteComparable[T comparable](h *Hash,...

This proposal has been added to the [active column](https://go.dev/s/proposal-status#active) of the proposals project and will now be reviewed at the weekly proposal review meetings. — rsc for the proposal review...

This proposal has been added to the [active column](https://go.dev/s/proposal-status#active) of the proposals project and will now be reviewed at the weekly proposal review meetings. — rsc for the proposal review...

Does anyone object to marking these deprecated?

Based on the discussion above, this proposal seems like a **[likely accept](https://go.dev/s/proposal-status#likely-accept)**. — rsc for the proposal review group

No change in consensus, so **[accepted](https://go.dev/s/proposal-status#accepted)**. 🎉 This issue now tracks the work of implementing the proposal. — rsc for the proposal review group