Basecalling-comparison
Basecalling-comparison copied to clipboard
rrwick
A comparison of different Oxford Nanopore basecallers
Dear manager, Thanks for your sharing this nice repo. I am a new guy in this field. now I am eager to reproduce your experiments. I have installed and downloaded...
This is not a issue related to this github repository, but I wonder if you also had a similar error when basecalling on the Ecoli benchmark fast5 files: Fast5 read...
Firstly, thanks for this great work. I wonder if you could comment on the following: If I understand it right, the assemblies here are generated with known reference and Illumina...
Hi Ryan, would you mind doing the benchmark on the Chiron v0.5. We have remade the model and it's 10X fast than before and it would be good to know...
Did you want the URL to take people to the top page at biorxiv rather than your manuscript?
Hey I was look to repurpose your read_length.py script and also wanted to use R script. I was wondering how did you generate the read_data.tsv file, is this coming from...
I could not find the comparison of the granularity of the basecaller. For example, does albacore basecall every event to produce how many basepairs etc
Do you have any experience with `BasecRAWller: Streaming Nanopore Basecalling Directly from Raw Signal` (link to pre-print: [bioRxiv](https://www.biorxiv.org/content/biorxiv/early/2017/05/01/133058.full.pdf))
