Reuben Thomas
Reuben Thomas
@entorb, this sounds more like a "critical edition"; I don't think it's that useful for a normal version (especially printable; it's less of a problem adding appendices to the PDF)....
I've rebased.
@wimpunk, is there anything left to resolve with this issue?
> (semi-related: @rrthomas can you unarchive the docs repo?) Done.
I'd be very happy to archive (or whatever is possible) the SF page and end the mailing list, in each case with a suitable notice redirecting to GitHub.
Unfortunately the only documentation currently for providers is the source. The enchant source does not have to be modified. Start at `enchant-lsmod.c` to see how the searching works. I'd be...
@norayr is this still something that might be interesting to you? I have recently changed the provider interface completely, and declared it "private", that is, internal to Enchant, but of...
Hi, thanks for responding! To explain the current situation: 1. Spelling providers are dynamically-loaded plugins, so it's always *possible* to write one without committing to this project. (Also, the license...
That's a good point. As you can see, Enchant already uses C, C++, Objective C++ and Vala. I would certainly consider adding any language that compiles to C, or probably...
Fixed in rrthomas/master, will be merged and released shortly. Thanks for the issue!