Reuben Thomas
Reuben Thomas
Thanks for trying, @sifflejoe. Do you mean that you implemented your suggestions for `fdopen`? If so, can we please have a patch, we can then at least use it for...
Sorry, I was thinking of detecting the difference at compile time, but you're right, that's not enough. That's annoying, because the code appears to work on LuaJIT (the Travis tests...
Indeed, it does fail when invoked manually, not sure why the spec doesn't have a problem. I'll file an issue about that. I agree that it's best to have `fdopen`...
As far as I can see, these are ncurses functions. As Gary says, they're not POSIX functions; therefore they don't belong in luaposix. I can see two sensible routes: 1....
I merged the projects back when lcurses was POSIX-only and managing a single project seemed easier than two. I don't have time to re-split the projects at present; I suggest...
It would seem more sensible for it to be an independent project.
Hi both, I'm very happy for you to look after lcurses; I'm not really using it at present, so happy to pass it on to the next maintainer(s)!
Arguably such a module should be part of lfs, not of luaposix: it's effectively another "back-end" for LFS.
Sorry, I thought the idea was to allow people to migrate to luaposix. If the idea is to improve LFS, probably better to discuss this with its upstream, and take...
A separate rock seems sensible here, `lfs-posix`: being Lua-only it should be pretty stable across Lua versions, and the LFS API also seems mature.