David Ward

@jmarks That does not help with the main two issues in the use case: - users not being able to create new frameworks - users incorrectly using the "Creator" field

Related to #502 ?

As we create more administrative functions I would think it would become *more important* to be able to segregate the permission sets and give only those that are needed to...

Another idea has come up on this topic. Allow Super Users to create their own roles based on the privileges available. For the scenario above, the Super User could create...

Yes. I am thinking along the lines of something akin to Drupal's permissioning where the current set would be a default set of roles provided and then could be customized...

Note that it is actually the abbreviated statement that is shown at the top of the section (which defaults to the full statement).

One can already get the CFLicense information from the URI. Currently the full licence text is shown on the right hand side. I believe this issue is asking for the...

I'm not sure we need to have users provide that information yet, especially since most of the "teacher" users for this story would be expected to be anonymous users.

How should we structure the `jurisdiction` attribute? Did we want it to be just a plain text field or more structured to have a hierarchy and possibly allow for ip...

@jmarks The listed story has nothing to do with organisations nor licences. Yes, we need to work on how to make things easier for creating frameworks, but this is more...