Even Rouault

@tohka Hello. Do you think the grids are OK to be included ?

Cf https://github.com/OSGeo/PROJ-data/commit/1171740b1b68c00a791446cd4c517579a3836374 . You could likely get nl_nsgi_naptrans2018.tif back from the proj-data-1.9 archive. @Jochem-L FYI apparently https://github.com/OSGeo/PROJ-data/pull/80 breaks legacy workflows

> Should it be removed or replaced, as `nl_nsgi_naptrans2018.tif` is not anymore in cdn? it should be removed if we don't provide nl_nsgi_naptrans2018.tif anymore

GSD95 is indicated to be superseded, and it is not referenced in the EPSG dataset. IMHO, it would thus be moderately useful for most end users to include it in...

The grid_alternatives table of proj.db has 3 columns: - original_grid_name: contains the value used in the EPSG dataset, e.g. ggeoid16.gri - proj_grid_name: contains the value of the geotiff PROJ filename,...

> With that in mind, would updating the grid names in EPSG make it possible us to rename the grids in PROJ-data? My reading of the code is that a...

> Would you accept a pull request to that effect, replacing instances of "uk" with "gb" where appropriate, or is "uk" used for a specific reason? uk was used out...

> I take it it would be unacceptable if I made a pull request that renamed the relevent files? You would also need to make corresponding changes in https://github.com/OSGeo/PROJ/blob/master/data/sql/grid_alternatives.sql ....

Looking at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_ISO_3166_country_codes, the good news is that "uk" is not taken for another country (Ukraine is "UA"). And we have kind of an excuse from this note in the...

Hi @msmitherdc Who created / what was the creation process for that file ? This file is 427 MB large. I don't think we want to include that directly in...